Skip to main content
High-voltage circuit breakers and insulator stacks in an outdoor substation

Energy & Power Infrastructure

Power projects are governed by queues, outages, and equipment lead times — three constraints an owner can plan around but cannot compress.

Project types

Substations and switchyards

Transmission and distribution

Utility interconnection

Microgrids

Battery and long-duration storage

Solar and wind

Natural gas and distributed generation

Cogeneration

Nuclear restarts and life extension

Small modular reactor site works and grid tie-ins

Grid controls and protection

Storm hardening and undergrounding

Power system commissioning

Where projects fail in this sector

These failure modes recur across programs in this sector. None of them are construction problems.

  • Interconnection queue timelines treated as schedule inputs rather than constraints

    A queue position is a constraint the project must be built around. Treated as an input, it silently absorbs every other float in the program.

  • Long-lead transformer and breaker procurement misaligned with construction

    Equipment that arrives after the pad is ready is a cost problem. Equipment ordered against a schedule that later moves is a much larger one.

  • Brownfield integration underestimated

    Tying into an energized facility is an outage-planning problem, a protection problem, and an operations problem before it is a construction problem.

  • Controls and protection commissioning compressed at the end

    The most technically demanding scope on the project routinely ends up with the least remaining schedule.

  • Permitting sequence not driving design

    Where the permitting pathway is not allowed to shape the design sequence, the design gets done twice.

Common questions — Energy & Power Infrastructure

Can an interconnection queue position be accelerated?

In most jurisdictions, no. A queue is a sequencing mechanism for studies, and each study depends on the assumed state of the network, which depends on the projects ahead of it. That dependency is why position generally cannot be bought, escalated, or negotiated. It also means the date is exposed to other parties' decisions — a withdrawal ahead of you can force rework behind it. The correct treatment is to model the connection as a fixed constraint and sequence the project from it, not toward it.

Is on-site generation a way around a long interconnection wait?

Sometimes, but it substitutes one regulatory path for another rather than removing one. Generating on site requires an emissions authorization, a fuel supply with its own connection process, frequently water for cooling, noise and land-use consents, and a grid-interaction agreement. Several of those sit on longer clocks than the interconnection they were meant to avoid, and generation equipment has its own multi-quarter order book.

What does a non-firm or flexible connection offer actually commit the project to?

It commits the site to accepting curtailment on defined terms, and those terms are a technical specification in a commercial document. Four parameters decide the engineering consequence: how often curtailment can be called, how long an event can last, how much notice is given, and whether the obligation is to reduce to a level or to disconnect entirely. Read together they determine whether the response can be operational or requires on-site generation or storage sized to the obligation.

Why does commissioning so often compress on power projects?

Because it sits at the end of the network and inherits every upstream delay, while the in-service date is usually fixed by something external. Controls and protection commissioning is the most technically demanding work on the project and is routinely attempted with the least remaining time, on systems still being completed around it. The remedy is a sequencing decision taken early — completing and handing over system by system — not additional effort applied late.

How is brownfield integration usually underestimated?

By treating tie-ins to an operating asset as construction activities rather than as outage-dependent constraints. Work that requires the existing plant to be de-energized can only happen in windows the operator will grant, those windows are scarce and seasonal, and missing one can cost a quarter or more. The available outage calendar should shape the program before the program is baselined.

Discuss a project in this sector.